Sustainability goals: New analysis shows 31% emissions gap between ocean carriers on same trade lane

Only feeder vessels, which accounted for 63.9% of all Q2 voyages, became less efficient, and that single segment’s decline was sufficient to pull the fleet-wide average in the wrong direction.

“That is the risk of managing to an average: It can point you in the opposite direction of what is actually happening,” said Constantine Komodromos, chief executive and founder of VesselBot, in a release.

Large ships do disproportionate work with fewer emissions

The report highlighted the outsized role of mega-ships in global container trade. Neo-Panamax and VLCS vessels ran just 7.4% of all voyages in Q2 but generated 43.5% of total transport work while accounting for only 27.4% of emissions.

Feeder and Panamax vessels showed the inverse pattern, operating 80% of voyages, generating just 26% of transport work, and producing 45.6% of total emissions.

The report is based on AIS-tracked voyage data and VesselBot’s vessel-specific digital twin models, measuring Well-to-Wake emissions intensity at the individual voyage level rather than relying on carrier-reported averages or industry benchmarks.

The four major fronthaul trades — China/East Asia to Northern Europe, the Mediterranean, and the North America West Coast, plus Northern Europe to the North America East Coast — accounted for only 1.2% of all Q2 voyages but generated 21.7% of total quarterly transport work while producing just 12.3% of emissions.

On the Northern Europe-North America East Coast trade, where the quarterly average Well-to-Wake emissions intensity reached 138 grams CO2e per TEU-km, Hapag-Lloyd and Mediterranean Shipping Co. outperformed the route average but with markedly different results.

Hapag-Lloyd recorded an average emissions intensity of 80.7 grams CO2e per TEU-km, 59% below the trade average, while MSC posted 117.5 grams, 15% below. The comparison revealed a 31.3% efficiency gap between the two carriers despite similar voyage distances and port pairs, highlighting how vessel deployment, utilization, and voyage execution drive emissions outcomes.

“A trade lane average tells a shipper what a route looks like on paper. It does not tell them what happened on their shipment,” Komodromos said. “Distance alone cannot explain that spread. The difference is in how those voyages were executed.”

Utilization emerges as key efficiency driver

Vessel utilization emerged as one of the strongest predictors of voyage-level emissions intensity, the report found. Voyages in the most efficient emissions-intensity category averaged 80% utilization, compared to 31% for the least efficient. The most efficient voyages also carried close to 9,000 TEUs on average.

Read more articles by Stuart Chirls here.

Read more:

Fuel, congestion push trans-Pacific ocean rates near $9,500

Jones Act service gets new 10-year port deal

Maersk unfurls new sail power for container ship

New data shows on-time container shipping suffers biggest drop in 5 years

Port inspection leads to $10M counterfeit Nike, Adidas seizure in California