Flight attendants’ legal win in California could impact air cargo

WASHINGTON — A cargo industry official is calling on Congress to guard against state interference in airfreight operations following a recent court ruling in favor of California-based flight attendants at Alaska Airlines.

The U.S. Supreme Court last summer refused to hear Alaska Airlines’ appeal of a lower court ruling that a state’s wage laws apply to airline employees because they only have an indirect impact on airline services. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the carrier had to give flight attendants meal and rest breaks required under California law even though the Federal Aviation Act says that no state or locality can regulate the rates, routes or services of an air carrier.

Alaska Airlines (NYSE: ALK) and trade group Airlines for America (A4A) argued that the ruling is incompatible with Federal Aviation Administration rules for in-flight crews and would lead to canceled flights and higher fares. According to the A4A, at least 19 states have meal and rest break laws for workers.

“What happens if that spreads and individual states across the country decide to regulate other things that airlines do? We can’t operate with 50 different rules,” Steve Alterman, president of the Cargo Airline Association, told FreightWaves on the sidelines of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s aerospace summit here.