Watch Now


House, Senate lawmakers introduce road-crash victim bill

Legislation would create liaison at DOT for truck safety groups

Karth and her husband Jerry outside DOT headquarters in September 2023. (Photo: John Gallagher/FreightWaves)

WASHINGTON — Marianne Karth lost two daughters in a truck crash 11 years ago and has been on a mission since then to get regulators in Washington to step up oversight of truck safety so that other parents can avoid her trauma.

A major development in that quest was the introduction last week of identical bills in the U.S. House and Senate to establish a career (not politically appointed) victim advocate position within the U.S. Department of Transportation.

The goal is to ensure that concerns from families of those injured or killed on the nation’s roads are heard in Washington while also making DOT road safety policy more accessible to victims and their families.

On May 4, 2013, while driving from North Carolina to Texas with three of her children, Karth was hit by a truck in an adjacent lane that did not stop in time for slowed traffic. The impact spun her car around and the truck hit her car a second time, forcing it backward and underneath a second truck’s trailer, a type of car-truck collision known as an “underride” crash.


Karth and her son, who was riding in the front seat, survived the impact. But her daughters AnnaLeah and Mary, riding in the back seat, died as a result of catastrophic injuries.

“Eight years ago this month, I woke up with the thought in my head that a missing piece of the puzzle was a National Roadway Safety Advocate — someone to be a vigilant voice for vulnerable victims of vehicle violence … someone who would enable citizens to harness their grief and more effectively bring about change,” Karth said in statement.

“Indeed, may it become a reality and a blessing both to those families whose lives will never be the same and to others whose lives will be spared as a result.”

Karth shared her vision with Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., who introduced the Senate version of the DOT Victim and Survivor Advocate Act on Thursday. The House bill was introduced on Friday by Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn.


“Traffic accident victims and their families deserve an advocate in the Department of Transportation listening to their ideas for improving roadway safety, especially after suffering from a traffic crash,” Cohen said.

“The DOT Victim and Survivor Advocate Act will help ensure that victim-advocates have a point of contact to work with at DOT and give them a more permanent voice in DOT decision-making.”

The legislation is supported by 11 safety organizations, including the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, the Truck Safety Coalition and the Institute for Safer Trucking (IST).

“After the devastating loss of my New Mexico-raised teenager in a side underride crash with a semitrailer, I know the critical need for a dedicated point of contact within the Department of Transportation,” said Eric Hein, an IST board member.

“It has been extremely frustrating not having a single point of contact for vehicle safety advocates. The passage of this bill will provide much-needed support to families, who endure needless and horrific losses each year due to vehicle crashes.”

According to the bill, in addition to communicating to the Transportation secretary recommendations from safety advocates on the needs and objectives of DOT programs and activities relating to roadway safety, the national roadway safety advocate will be expected, among other things, to:

  • Explain DOT processes, procedures, scientific principles and technical information to stakeholders in plain language.
  • Publish educational materials for enhancing stakeholder understanding of activities and procedures of DOT in accessible formats and venues, with easy-to-understand wording.
  • Consult with and make recommendations to the DOT secretary relating to the appointment of stakeholders who may be appropriate for roles on advisory roadway safety committees.
  • Meet at least once a quarter with the DOT secretary to highlight issues, make recommendations for resolving problems and alleviating stakeholder roadway safety concerns, and summarize input from stakeholders on proposed roadway safety initiatives.

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.


5 Comments

  1. Mitchel Riesgraf

    Death is tragic no doubt! Yet data proves where advocates need to be before strangling the industry with any more “safety” regulations. Over regulation equals more stress, which equals less safety long term.

    According to 2020 NHTSA statistics for fatal crash, combination tractor trailer CDL drivers are only ticketed at fault 0.7% of the time. 99.3% of the time who or what else is at fault? Not the CDL holder! Investing time and efforts into driver education on both sides, public and commercial, would actually equal more safety. Most of the motoring public and many operating commercially would benefit greatly from better understanding of simple road courtesy reciprocation training and understanding their ego is half of the problem.

  2. Ranger Clark

    All due respect to Ms. Karth, and I mean that. I hate that she lost her daughters. But one crash does not equate to the industry needing another voice in the ears of those who are already heavy-handed when it comes to safety in the trucking industry. For one thing, the statistics remain the same: The overwhelming majority of incidents between cars and trucks is caused by cars.

  3. Teri B

    used to be that a driver “drove” the truck. Constantly vigilant on gauges and what gear to be in for the condition. A driver was busy reading the traffic patterns and aligned that to the performance of his rig. Driving was a science that was shared with one another at the truck stop restaurants and on the CB radio. I have seen the pile up videos and trucks plowing into stopped traffic. It is horrific and will continue until driver to driver communication improves. Until drivers are better trained before being cut loose. Until companies stop pushing the drivers to run more miles. Until shippers pay better freight rates so we can afford to do our job. Too many trucks on the road because too many people are buying throw away products that have to be continuously made. Help get some of these trucks off the road. Stop using Amazon and door dash. Buy your meat and vegetables from local farmers. I’m not against trucks, I just think there are too many.

  4. Stephen Webster

    Simple require all drivers to speak English that come more than 40 .iles I to the U S bring a tiered pay scale at a hourly rate plus overtime after 10 hours a day or 50 hours a week require all foreign drivers from Canada and Mexico have 20 months experience before coming into the U S past 40 .miles and paid at U S hourly rate while on U S soil plus proof of medical insurance and the drivers turnover would drop to 19% or less and less crashes plus allow all driver 1 hour P C to find safe parking.

  5. Pete

    All things considered equal.
    We in the trucking industry need this ,like a hole in the head.
    No one is more regulated then Comercial trucking.
    Not the RV
    Not the non Comercial driving public, even tho they operate vehicles as large and weigh as much.
    But no one advocates new regulations for them.
    If safety was the true concern,
    All heavy vehicles would be subject to new regulations ,,
    Comercial and noncommercial.
    Otherwise it leaves these safety groups open to suspicion.

Comments are closed.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.