Watch Now


Employers: Still time for East Coast port deal

East and Gulf Coast ports facing Oct. 1 longshore strike deadline

Port workers unload a cargo ship at the Port of Houston. (Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

Facing a dire countdown to the first dock strike in decades, employers at East and Gulf Coast ports say a new contract is still within reach, and publicly called for the International Longshoremen’s Association to return to contract talks.

“There has been no further progress on Master Contract negotiations – we remain committed to the bargaining process and need the ILA to return to the table,” the United States Maritime Exchange (USMX) said in a brief statement Friday.

The ILA, with the current contract set to expire Sept. 30, has set a strike deadline of Oct. 1. Officials on both sides have been reluctant to comment, and it’s unclear when the two sides last met for a formal bargaining session.

“While there are fewer than three weeks remaining until the expiration of our current agreement – if the ILA is willing to meet – it is still possible to agree to terms on a new Master Contract,” the USMX said.


In a Sept. 7 message to ILA members, President Harold Daggett and his son, Executive Vice President Dennis Daggett, accused employers of “putting profits over people” with what employers described as an industry-leading wage and with regard to automation, and wrote that the sides remained far apart on a new master contract. 

Published reports say the ILA has rquested a 77% pay raise over the six years of a new pact. Details on employers’ proposals have not been made public. West Coast dockworkers represented by the International Longshoremen’s and Warehouse Union approved a 32% increase in 2023.

They also pointed specifically to container royalties, which they described as a supplemental wage negotiated as part of the existing master contract. 

“Our members should never have to share their container royalty money with the ocean carriers, who are currently making record profits,” they wrote.


The ILA represents 45,000 workers at three dozen ports from Maine to Texas

“We need to sit down and negotiate a new agreement that avoids an unnecessary and costly strike that will be detrimental to both sides,” the USMX said in its statement.

Editor’s note: The ILA has requested a 77% pay increase over the life of a new contract. A previous version of this story attributed the offert to employers.

More coverage by Stuart Chirls

Could East Coast port strike spread to West Coast?

What to know about ILA demands in potential port strike


Salvage begins on burning tanker in Red Sea 

One Comment

  1. Charles cane

    One of the things, the I l a it’s considering having the ila do line running, which puts two companies out of business, and probably four hundred people out of work that’s a side deal as they call it The Ila expects people to work 16 to 24 hours street through. You think they’re gonna show up to show to tie ships up after working all those hours plus the Ila gets away with a lot. They have these things called spells and brakes where you get paid for 11 hours, but only work 5 hours. They get away with a lot, not against the I. L, a, but when you’re putting four hundred people out of work and two other companies just for greed, unless the ila is going to hire those people

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Stuart Chirls

Stuart Chirls is a journalist who has covered the full breadth of railroads, intermodal, container shipping, ports, supply chain and logistics for Railway Age, the Journal of Commerce and IANA. He has also staffed at S&P, McGraw-Hill, United Business Media, Advance Media, Tribune Co., The New York Times Co., and worked in supply chain with BASF, the world's largest chemical producer. Reach him at stuartchirls@firecrown.com.