Plans by federal regulators to issue a proposed rule requiring speed limiters on truck engines is getting pushback by a significant portion of the trucking sector.
The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s April notice seeking comment on the plan, which the agency aims to issue as a proposed rule for public comment in 2023, generated more than 15,000 responses. Most came from independent owner-operators and small trucking companies, which account for the majority of FMCSA’s regulated carriers. And most were adamantly against it.
“I lease my trucks to a company that requires us to limit our speed to 65 mph,” wrote the owner of IAB Trucking. “I feel it has made my drivers more unsafe, as they get caught up in packs of drivers now. They are unable to maneuver when necessary. And I think automobile drivers are even angrier around trucks that have their speed limited. Please, do not require this.”
IAB Trucking’s sentiment was typical and was echoed among a large sampling of responses: Roads are less safe when trucks are unable to adjust their speed to surrounding traffic.
Benefits underscored
FMCSA’s planned petition will be in the form of a supplement to a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that was issued jointly in 2016 with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It will propose that trucks weighing over 26,000 pounds that are equipped with an electronic engine speed governor be required to limit the truck’s speed to a rate to be determined by the rulemaking and maintain the speed setting for the life of the vehicle.
The American Trucking Associations, which developed a speed governing policy for commercial trucks in 2007, initially supported a fixed maximum speed of 65 mph for all Class 7 and 8 trucks with electronic speed governors manufactured after 1992.
ATA has since revised its policy to take into account the development of safety technology aimed at allowing trucks to travel faster and safer. For Class 7 and 8 trucks manufactured after 1992 equipped with automatic emergency braking (AEB) and adaptive cruise control, ATA supports setting speed governors to a maximum speed of 70 mph, according to comments filed at FMCSA.
The Truckload Carriers Association and Road Safe America, a nonprofit “with a mission to reduce the number of crashes between trucks and passenger cars,” both support ATA’s stance. Providing the option of a maximum speed of 70 mph for trucks using AEB and adaptive cruise control “would give existing fleets an incentive to purchase and use these amazing safety technologies,” wrote Road Safe America’s Steve Owings.
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety also supports speed limiters — but it wants the maximum speed set to 60 mph.
The safety group cited “incontrovertible” safety benefits highlighted in the FMCSA’s 2016 NPRM, where the agency noted that crashes involving heavy vehicles traveling faster are more deadly than those involving trucks traveling at lower speeds.
“The 2016 NPRM estimates that setting the device at 60 mph has the potential to save almost 500 lives and prevent nearly 11,000 injuries annually,” commented Advocates President Catherine Chase. “By comparison, the NPRM clearly states that setting the speed at 65 or 68 mph will result in far less lives saved and injuries prevented.”
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) also considers speed limiters a needed safety requirement, although it did not advocate for a particular speed setting for the devices.
“Although the use of speed limiters on large trucks has raised concerns about creating speed differentials between trucks and other vehicles, research has documented that trucks already travel significantly slower than passenger vehicles, including on roads with speed limits raised to among the highest in the nation,” IIHS stated.
Less safe, more delays?
The thousands of individual owner-operators commenting on the proposal who opposed requiring speed limiters on their trucks were backed by associations representing small businesses, in particular the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.
| Speed limit | Number | Percent |
| 25 mph or less | 123 | 2.7% |
| 30-35 mph | 316 | 7.1% |
| 40-45 mph | 635 | 14.2% |
| 50-55 mph | 1,491 | 33.3% |
| 60-65 mph | 897 | 20% |
| 70-75 mph | 860 | 19.2% |
| 80-85 mph | 24 | 0.5% |
| No statutory limit | 45 | 1.0% |
| Unknown | 88 | 2.0% |
| Total | 4,479 | 100% |
(Updated Oct. 2021). Source: FMCSA
In addition to unsafe speed differentials resulting if speed limits on certain roads have higher speed limits than those governed by the engine’s control unit, speed limiters take away a driver’s ability to avoid accidents and unsafe road conditions, according to OOIDA President and CEO Todd Spencer.
In addition, “speed limiters increase driver stress and make drivers more fatigued because they must operate longer hours in order to complete the work expected of them, and they must also operate at the maximum allowed speed for more of those hours,” Spencer said. “In a survey of our members, drivers that are required by their carriers to use speed limiters also report feeling pressure to ‘make up’ time on local roads when the posted speed limit is lower than the speed set on the truck.”
The Livestock Marketing Association, which represents more than 80% of local livestock auction markets, agreed that the use of speed limiters “ignores the very real safety hazard of speed differentials and fails to account for the safety impacts when a 60, 65 or 68 mph limit is applied to a [truck] while surrounding traffic are traveling speeds 10, 15 or even 20 mph faster. This difference in speeds will cause more dangerous conditions for the motoring public.”
Mandating slower truck speeds, he said, “will literally slow the movement of freight through the supply chain. At a time when businesses and families are having difficulties securing the supplies they need, this proposal would create additional challenges and delays.”
One commenter used FMCSA’s own data to counter research from safety and insurance groups used to support speed limiters (see table, above).
The commenter noted that according to FMCSA, highways with posted speed limits of 50-55 mph account for 33.3% of all fatal crashes and that highways with speed limits of 60-65 mph and 70-75 mph account for significantly fewer fatalities.
“What is more, this data shows that out of 4,479 fatal crashes only 1.0% (45 fatal crashes) occurred in areas with no statutory speed limit” and 97% occurred in areas with speed limits. “This evidence suggests on its face that fatal crashes are less likely, not more, as posted speed limits are increased or removed altogether.”
Related articles:
- Speed limiters, automatic braking on NTSB Most Wanted List
- Safety ratings at risk for violators of proposed speed limiter law
- US senators propose 65-mph truck speed limiters
Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.
Thomas Ingram
It’s not the trucks causing these wrecks or injuries, it’s the lack of driver training. Slowing trucks down will cause more frustration out of passenger vehicles and more delays. Very foolish idea slowing these trucks down. Other drivers needs to learn how to drive around these large trucks.
Mike
If they actually cared about crashes they would look harder at the cars that cause the majority. In recent years cars have gotten more aggressive in driving and more inpatient about it. Doesn’t matter what speed the trucks are moving.
Everyone involved in policy making should have to spend a week or two in a truck in some of the highest traffic lanes for a first hand view of what we see daily
B. Carter
Safety,…yes it’s always needed…but if you don’t address all those driver’s in all motor vehicles then your leaving out part of the formula…everyday I drove on the highways I saw numerous unsafe driving habits from all types of vehicles…maybe having driver control personnel monitors like parking personnel monitor’s you will be driver’s in check
Clayton Matthews
I have a feeling that alot of the people talking about how GREAT these new features on class 8 trucks are have never been in one before. I agree that yes sometimes work but they also are very dangerous. These systems pick up overhead road signs and roadside reflectors as hazards and SLAM on the brakes for no reason. If you are in a corner and loaded and the truck slams on the brakes for no apparent reason how’s at fault if that truck goes over??? What about in the snow and ice??? It’s CRAZINESS
James
That’s part of our government putting out false numbers and lying to us so they can get there way and control us more. The numbers are right there slower speeds kill more drivers. Why don’t they put speed limiters on cars. It’s just as easy to set the speed in the ecm on a car as it is on a truck. People in government think they know more than the people out here on the roads dealing with traffic backups because of speed limited trucks every day. It’s so dangerous because there are so many trucks in a convoy if one of them towards the front has a mishap it’s a very dangerous situation. People in cars get angry and drive aggressively possibly causing a major accident. I have seen it many times. Cars going around a line of trucks on the shoulder at highway speeds.
GJE
If you limit cmv to 70 then limit all cars pickups to 70 mph also
Mark Roberts
I have been a truck driver for 38 years and worked through many changes when moststates did away with split speed limits it became much safer with far less road rage . I do think that speed can be adjustable for new drivers and driving experience and perfect records should be rewarded not demoted.If this goes through I will retire early to stay alive. Creating a major mess for the industry
Michael Zachmann
The government should start mandating speed limiters on the engines of cars instead of trucks. Since most accidents statistically are a cars fault and not the truck driver. Car speed needs to be regulated. Too many people driving cars at 30mph over the speed limit