Watch Now


News Alert: State court says applying AB5 to California trucking not preempted by significant federal law

Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves

The prospect of California’s AB5 impacting the state’s trucking sector moved a step closer to reality Thursday when a California Court of Appeals ruled that the law governing the hiring of independent contractors was not preempted by a federal law. 

In a case that was first filed before AB5 passed the California legislature in 2019, the drayage company Cal Cartage had won an earlier ruling that AB5 was preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, legislation passed in the 1990s. It was that law, known as F4A, that also was cited by a federal court earlier this year as preempting the application of AB5 in the trucking sector. That earlier federal decision is being appealed. 

But in the ruling Thursday, a three-judge panel unanimously ruled that AB5 is not preempted by F4A. 

At issue with AB5 and the role of independent owner-operators has always been the B prong of the so-called ABC test inherent in AB5 used to determine whether a worker for a company can be an independent contractor or should be ruled an employee. The B test states a worker is an employee if his or her responsibilities are the same as the company’s fundamental business, such as a trucking company hiring a truck driver to move freight. A worker hired by that same company to do landscaping around the company’s headquarters is not performing the company’s essential function and therefore would not be considered an employee.


But the earlier rulings held that sections of F4A regarding the ability or inability of states to govern certain aspects of interstate commerce meant that AB5 could not be applied to trucking. The appellate court disagreed.

Cal Cartage, as defendant, has “not demonstrated … that application of the ABC test prohibits motor carriers from using independent contractors or otherwise directly affects motor carriers’ prices, routes, or services,” the appellate panel wrote. Nothing in the judicial history of similar cases nor the history of F4A “suggests Congress intended to preempt a worker-classification test applicable to all employers in the state.”

FreightWaves will continue to follow this story.

More articles by John Kingston


A second court puts a big hit on imposing AB5 against the California trucking sector

Trucking attorney: proposition passage in California bolsters AB5 exemption case

Prop 22 wins in California, takes Uber, Lyft and other drivers out from AB5

John Kingston

John has an almost 40-year career covering commodities, most of the time at S&P Global Platts. He created the Dated Brent benchmark, now the world’s most important crude oil marker. He was Director of Oil, Director of News, the editor in chief of Platts Oilgram News and the “talking head” for Platts on numerous media outlets, including CNBC, Fox Business and Canada’s BNN. He covered metals before joining Platts and then spent a year running Platts’ metals business as well. He was awarded the International Association of Energy Economics Award for Excellence in Written Journalism in 2015. In 2010, he won two Corporate Achievement Awards from McGraw-Hill, an extremely rare accomplishment, one for steering coverage of the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster and the other for the launch of a public affairs television show, Platts Energy Week.