WASHINGTON — Legislation being promoted for giving states more flexibility to waive truck weight limits in an emergency would also give state authorities broad new power to raise weight limits for all kinds of freight, according to a lobby group that opposes overweight trucks.
The legislation, the Modernizing Operations for Vehicles in Emergencies (MOVE) Act, introduced last month by U.S. Reps. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D., and Jim Costa, D-Calif., is a way to “remove unnecessary roadblocks and red tape” to avert supply chain disruptions such as what occurred during and after the pandemic, according to the bill’s sponsors, both of whom represent agribusiness shippers.
“During times of emergency and the pandemic, struggling communities in my district were hit hardest by roadblocks to our supply chain,” said Costa, whose district includes parts of California’s San Joaquin Valley. “This bipartisan legislation will remove barriers that prevent us from delivering vital relief when communities need it most.”
The MOVE Act expands the circumstances under which the federal government could allow a state to waive federal weight limits along interstate highways for loads “that can easily be dismantled or divided” to include not only natural emergencies involving weather, disease, and wildfires, and other causes but also if supply chains are “substantially impaired in the state, either in terms of slow overall movement, freight traffic congestion, or otherwise,” according to language in the bill.
The legislation would allow such waivers to remain in effect for 270 days, compared to the 120-day maximum under current law, with the ability for states to extend the waivers for another 90 days.
In addition to the American Trucking Associations, the MOVE Act is supported by the Shippers Coalition, whose members include agribusinesses, aggregates, beverage companies and other shippers of heavy cargo that benefits most from higher weight limits.
“The MOVE Act is a necessary step forward in ensuring that Shippers Coalition’s members are able to promptly and efficiently respond in times of crisis,” said Shippers Coalition Executive Director Sean Joyce. “By expanding the definition of an emergency, the legislation guarantees that Americans across the country will continue to have access to essential goods in their times of need.”
Safety concerns raised
But the Coalition Against Bigger Trucks (CABT), which opposes efforts to loosen truck weight limit requirements, sees the MOVE Act as a way to further empower states to raise weight restrictions, which can lead to higher crash rates.
The group points to a 2016 U.S. Department of Transportation report that found heavier trucks have higher crash rates compared to 80,000-pound, single-trailer trucks.
“State governors would have unilateral authority beyond emergencies and natural disasters to arbitrarily increase truck weights based on undefined definitions of supply chain disruptions or freight congestion,” CABT President Brad Roseberry told FreightWaves.
“There’s nothing prohibiting a state to reissue another permit when the initial one expires, so this could go on forever,” he said. It’s basically a blank check for states to raise truck weights — that’s huge.”
Owner operators also cite safety concerns in opposing efforts to raise truck weight limits.
“I’ve hauled for relief efforts before, and if it’s strictly about an emergency relief situation, that’s fine,” said Lee Schmitt, an owner-operator and spokesman for CDL Drivers Unlimited, a truck driver advocacy group.
“But now you’re potentially giving carte blanche to anyone with a trailer to haul heavier loads in equipment that may not be able to handle it. It’s also a safety issue — heavier loads require more distance to start and stop, and not having experience with that can make the roads less safe for everyone.”
Several other proposals aimed at easing truck weight restrictions are also pending in Congress, including a voluntary pilot program that would allow states to increase truck weights on federal interstates from 80,000 pounds to up to 91,000 pounds on six axles, and a proposal that would allow weight increases to 88,000 for certain auto haulers.
Victor Semenets
It amazes me how clueless these people are, we got so many dam trucks on the road half of them are sitting at the Truck Stops with no loads what they need to do is drop the weight to half and create more loads for trucks to haul for and here is the big problem, you ready…. It’s the greedy sum ma rich corporation’s that don’t wana pay or staff a full warehouse with more dock workers I’ve sat 8 hours waiting to get unloaded or messing around with the recivers bs red tape lol yeah raise the weight they say make the single guy do more work you guys are a bunch of bunny’s hop along to the tune…
Harjeet Singh
Just a way for large corporations to make more money.ship more less drivers needed same pay not many get paid by weight,use more fuel,cost more for independent drivers,extra wear and tear,bring price down for o/o drivers to run would solve the problem.
Rene Garcia
Typical Raise the weight but not the rates
Poppa Earl
Emergency declaration is one thing
Our trucks, our tires, our suspension systems are built to handle so much. It may handle more but they build them to handle just a little more than we can haul now.
Hauling more weight means, you’ll need different tres,, different suspension that can handle that extra weight specially in long distances, and higher temperatures.
I say leave the weights alone. The new drivers can’t handle a light weight truck. And us more experienced drivers are slowly going away from driving due to retirement age, and nobody so far is there to take our places,so we just have to grow old in our trucks and keep on keeping on.
Stefan
Just a way for large corporations to make more money.ship more less drivers needed same pay not many get paid by weight,use more fuel,cost more for independent drivers,extra wear and tear,bring price down for o/o drivers to run would solve the problem
Lst
In europe they can haul as standard heavier 88000lbs loads with 48ft 3-axle trailers so a bump in US regulations shouldnt be bad tho overweight meaning over that number or 90000lbs should still require more experience and permits
Victor
As if our infrastructure isn’t torn up enough, they want to give options to make it get worse by heavier weights. Don’t be fooled. There’s an effort out there to increase maximum weight of rail cars from 286000 to 309000 lbs as well. Personally, I think we need to lower the weight limit rather than raise it. But I know that will never happen.
Stephen Pariseau
We all know that roads would deteriorate faster if weights were increased. We can’t keep up with repairs now. I don’t see the advantage to increasing weights.