Watch Now


How a $1.25 million insurance liability hike may affect owner-operators

Proposed rate increase in Congress would be “huge financial obstacle” for small-fleet truckers, says insurance expert

(Photo: Jim Allen/FreightWaves)

A push by lawmakers to raise truck liability insurance for the first time in 40 years has advanced further than ever in Congress and the resulting rate increases would hit small trucking companies the hardest, according to an insurance expert.

The provision included in the Moving Forward Act, which the U.S. House of Representatives passed on July 1, raises the minimum coverage level for general freight from $750,000 per accident to $2 million. It would be adjusted every five years to account for inflation based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

The minimum coverage cap is $2.9 million less than what was proposed in a standalone bill introduced last year, known as the INSURANCE Act, which called for hiking minimum coverage to $4.9 million. But it still represents a $1.25 million jump in coverage — or 166% — that many owner-operators would not be able to afford, according to Thom Albrecht, CFO and chief revenue officer at Reliance Partners Insurance.

“It would be a huge financial obstacle to overcome,” Albrecht told FreightWaves. He explained that fleets in general can take steps to help lower insurance premiums, such as investing in technologies like lane departure warning systems, collision avoidance, active braking and forward-looking cameras.


“However, in terms of micro fleets [10 or fewer trucks], their lack of scale, along with cash flow issues, will keep most of them from the aforementioned investments. So the 166% increase in minimum liability coverage will disproportionately hit them, along with many fleets with 11 to even 200 or 300 trucks.”

In a 2013 report on carrier liability responsibility, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) asserted that doubling the level of liability does not imply a doubling of the dollar value of the risk. “It depends upon how frequently the higher cost events occur, relative to the frequency of the lower value,” FMCSA stated.

But Albrecht said that while midsize to large fleets typically will have self-insurance retention, where they can afford to pay anywhere from $1 million to $5 million and higher on their own before their insurance policy kicks in, smaller fleets typically can afford only “first-dollar” liability, where coverage starts from the first dollar of the cost of an accident.

“So using simple math, if you’re now paying $7,000 to $8,000 per truck per year, you’re potentially looking at more than doubling their rates,” Albrecht said, which could mean those same rates increasing to $15,000 to $20,000 per truck annually. He pointed out that insurance companies would also factor in risk assessments when coming up with a rate.


A recent survey on nuclear verdicts by the American Transportation Research Institute found that over the past two to five years, commercial truck insurance premiums have increased 35%-40% annually for low- to average-risk carriers, at similar rates as increasing litigation awards. Increasing insurance costs have also been cited as being indirectly — and sometimes directly — behind recent trucking bankruptcies, including a 13-power-unit company in Illinois forced to shut down earlier this month.

Increasing the minimum liability caps to $2 million — a change that’s supported by trial attorneys — is not going to address the higher insurance costs associated with nuclear verdicts, Albrecht contends. “Our conversations with fleets suggest that only 2-5% of all claims exceed the current $750,000 minimum. So the question is, what does the $2 million level solve?”

Fortunately for small trucking companies, the provision to raise the cap on insurance liability is contained in an infrastructure bill that the U.S. Senate is not likely to support. Still, Albrecht recommends that owner-operators check in with their insurance brokers. “It’s not only what your loss runs have been and your driver profiles, but where those losses are incurred now, and what that could mean if you get in a trial situation,” he said.

“At the end of the day, there has to be an incredible focus on safety, whether you’ve got one truck, 1,000 or 10,000.”

 Related articles:

Click for more FreightWaves articles by John Gallagher.

23 Comments

  1. Julio Perez Alicea

    Allways trying to choked up the small guys.
    Instead of going after brokers that wants to keep all the money and other companies that wants to keep the truckers under their feet.

  2. B.wright

    I have 35 years in the industry, I’m on the fence to buy a truck. Between the ELD mandate and now this over the top insurance grab, I have to ask why bother with the American dream. The holes in this deal is there is no raising of liability for 4 wheelers. Secondly they don’t address the agriculture exemption. You have tens of thousands of trucks on the road with no cdl operators and just farm insurance.

  3. Alric

    If trucking companies, even the large get hit it will affect them. How about rate hikes to counter inflation instead of letting these idiots just keep costing the industry more and more. Stop supplying these fools for a couple weeks and I garuntee this stops.

  4. S Smith

    Just one more way to take another chunk out of owner operators .fuel goes up and rate increase doesn’t go up for months .then rates goes up .and fuel goes up but rates stay the same. The trucker never gets even or ahead but is always the last to be compensated. Yet most valuable and dependable for delivering goods. you already have alot of small cars or (4 wheelers) who see trucks and cut them off by intentionally taking away their safe stopping distance. Just hoping they get hit so they can call attorney and have a great chance at huge money, so if the 1.2 million $increase goes through then trucks don’t stand a chance ..Chuy Garcia trucks should boycot your state and idea and not deliver into your state .

  5. scott s.

    Just one more way to take another chunk out of owner operators .fuel goes up and rate increase doesn’t go up for months .then rates goes up .and fuel goes up but rates stay the same. The trucker never gets even or ahead but is always the last to be compensated. Yet most valuable and dependable for delivering goods. you already have alot of small cars or (4 wheelers) who see trucks and cut them off by intentionally taking away their safe stopping distance. Just hoping they get hit so they can call attorney and have a great chance at huge money, so if the 1.2 million $increase goes through then trucks don’t stand a chance ..Chuy Garcia trucks should boycot your state and idea and not deliver into your state .

  6. Anthony Smith

    They called upon us To help with State of Of emergency situation now they want to put big bulls eye on the back of a truck everybody’s gonna want a piece of 2 million dollars

    1. Joe

      Yeah higher insurance and lower freight rates let’s see how long it takes for this country to come to a halt that’s good move good luck is all I can say.

  7. CM Evans

    The key words in the article are that the “trial lawyers approve.” How is it that everything revolves around these pricks ?

  8. Marc Portecca

    You know everyone has their hand in the trucking industry but the owner operators…. inflation the rates haven’t raised …the rates about the same for the last 34 years …. Everything else has gone up except truck pay and drivers wages…. Just another example we have people making decisions in this business that have no idea what’s going on…

Comments are closed.

John Gallagher

Based in Washington, D.C., John specializes in regulation and legislation affecting all sectors of freight transportation. He has covered rail, trucking and maritime issues since 1993 for a variety of publications based in the U.S. and the U.K. John began business reporting in 1993 at Broadcasting & Cable Magazine. He graduated from Florida State University majoring in English and business.