Watch Now


Truckers at Oakland protest say ‘cargo won’t flow until AB5 goes’

Terminal gates blocked on Day 3 of port truckers’ demonstration against California’s independent contractor law

Oakland truckers say they may continue AB5 protest after Wednesday. Photo: Kimberly Sulsar-Campos

Around 450 protesters opposing AB5 were blocking all of the terminal gates at the Port of Oakland, forcing TraPac and the largest terminal operator, Oakland International Container Terminal, also known as SSA, to close operations on Wednesday.

“Oakland International Container Terminal (OICT) management decided to close operations today due to the independent trucker protest,” Roberto Bernardo, director of communications for the Port of Oakland, told FreightWaves in an email on Wednesday. 

“The port’s other three marine terminals are effectively shut down for trucks as well,” he said. “There are some vessel labor operations underway.”

TraPac sent a message to drayage truckers that the terminal’s first shift wasn’t working Wednesday “due to ongoing protests interfering with the in-gate.”


The protesters’ message to California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday: “The cargo won’t flow until AB5 goes.” 

“Gov. Newsom continues to ignore the independent truckers who are the backbone of America,” Kimberly Sulsar-Campos, vice president of Oakland-based Iraheta Bros. Trucking, told FreightWaves. 

Newsom signed Assembly Bill 5 — a controversial state law that seeks to limit the use of independent contractors and largely classify them as employee drivers — into law nearly three years ago. However, legal challenges prevented the law from going into effect in January 2020. 

That all changed when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the California Trucking Association’s challenge to AB5 in late June, returning the case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 


Now, truckers say Newsom and the California legislature could exempt trucking from AB5 as they have done for other industries, including lawyers, real estate agents and accountants. 

Proposition 22, which passed in November 2020, exempted app-based ride-share companies Uber and Lyft from AB5.

Port truckers carried signs saying, “We demand an exemption now. We deserve respect for keeping the world economy and the USA rolling.”

Iraheta Bros. was founded by a group of owner-operators who wanted to start their own trucking company, Sulsar-Campos said. The drayage company now has 20 owner-operators who oppose AB5 and want a choice about how to run their businesses.

“It’s very disheartening that other professions are exempt from this law but not small-business truckers, who move vital cargo that feeds the world,” she said.

On Tuesday, nearly 100 members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 10 refused to cross the protest line as owner-operators in Oakland showed up early to block the gates of the SSA terminal.

“We are working without a contract right now so we support the owner-operators and understand what they are trying to do,” George, a nine-year ILWU member, who didn’t want to give his last name, told FreightWaves. 

Around 450 truckers blocked terminals at the Port of Oakland Wednesday. Photo: Kimberly Sulsar-Campos

Initially, port drivers in Oakland planned a one-day protest Monday. However, they decided to demonstrate until Wednesday and possibly through the end of the week. They claimed Port of Oakland officials downplayed the impact of the protest by stating there was “some traffic congestion” at TraPac and SSA terminals, when in fact, the truckers shut down traffic at three of the terminals. 


FreightWaves attended the Port of Oakland Truck Work Group meeting Monday where the truckers’ protest over AB5 was discussed.

At the meeting, Bill Aboudi, who owns Oakland-based AB Trucking, urged a port official in attendance not to minimize the disruption and economic effects the protest was having on the terminals’ business operations at the port.

“Downplaying the impact will upset the owner-operators more,” Aboudi said at the meeting, citing examples of how the Port of Oakland has responded to protests in the past.

Oakland protesters and owner-operators at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach own their own rigs and currently choose which loads they want to take. They don’t want to work as company drivers as many would be forced to do under AB5. Drivers protested at Los Angeles and Long Beach last week. 

One independent contractor who serves the Port of Oakland said he would have to sell his house and move his family out of California if he’s forced to become an employee and be paid hourly.

“Have you seen the real estate prices for houses or rent in this state?” the 20-year port driver, who didn’t want to be named for fear of retaliation, told FreightWaves. “On a good day, I can make $1,200, but if I go to work for a company and they only pay me $25 an hour and also control the number of hours I can work, I can’t afford to feed my family.”

The independent contractor law stems from the California Supreme Court’s decision against Dynamex Operations West Inc., a package and document delivery company. The court found that Dynamex had misclassified its delivery drivers as independent contractors rather than employees and that all California-based companies that use independent contractors must follow the “ABC test,” a three-pronged test to determine whether a worker is an employee.

The B prong defines an independent contractor as a worker engaged in “work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business.” That is problematic for motor carriers utilizing independent owner-operators to move freight.

Aboudi, who has six drivers who move containers in and out of the Port of Oakland, blasted AB5.

“Many drivers who work in the ports immigrated to this country so they could have a choice and the freedom to decide how and when they want to work,” Aboudi told FreightWaves. “This is a bad law because it takes away their choice to be an owner-operator and forces them to become a company driver. It’s un-American.”

Read more here:

Unionized workers refuse to cross truckers’ AB5 protest line at Port of Oakland

Hundreds of truckers block Oakland terminal access to protest AB5

Truckers plan LA/Long Beach work stoppage Wednesday to protest AB5

22 Comments

  1. JR

    AB5 was Sacramento’s union puppets arrogant gift to SEIU union lobbyists, who have dreams of adding millions of new members from hapless independent contractors forced to go corporate and forced to join closed shop unions. Huzzah for ILWU taking sides with independent truckers. AB5 is a neutron bomb for California’s gig economy. A holocaust for independent entrepreneurs. I hope the independent trucker strike spreads to LA and Long Beach, breaking the supply chain, forcing Newsom and Sacramento’s union puppets to fold like a lawn chair and repeal AB5.

  2. Lorrene Wilson

    I wish they would do this all the way up and down the coastline…this could turn into a return of Jimmy Hoffa days real quick if they start putting “scabs” to work.

    1. Vic

      Sounds like you guys are just driving prices up higher. And think about all the small businessmen that you’re driving out of business by not delivering their products or there’s bad things being done there’s worse things being done find another job then but don’t be blocking ports

  3. Alex p

    I’m a company drivers know , I been looking to start my trucking business in the past 2 years. If I knew that I need it to get my own permit,they did to and to do that I need to become and, LLC .So they don’t want to pay extra, thay just want the simple why ,So they knew about it and did nothing about

    1. Mp

      California’s lawmakers and Newsome are indentured servants to the unions. Its all about controlling everyone. Independent truckers dont want to be part of a union. AB5, forcing all truckers to be employees, is the only way for the unions to get these truckers under their control. Then the unions will give more money to these political prostitutes. If you want to reel in this problem make California a right to work state.

  4. Spencer Mynko

    Ironically, AB5 no longer exists – it was replaced by AB2257 and that is the statute that needs to be dealt with. That said, at the risk of being accused of shameless self-promotion, I urge stake holders to contact http://www.TransportationAttorneys.net for an informed discussion about the law. But if you don’t contact me, then contact another experienced transportation lawyer to get some meaningful legal advice. Don’t rely on the musings or internet postings of anonymous people for legal advice – talk to an expert. All the best to the independents and the MCs who utilize them.

Comments are closed.

Clarissa Hawes

Clarissa has covered all aspects of the trucking industry for 16 years. She is an award-winning journalist known for her investigative and business reporting. Before joining FreightWaves, she wrote for Land Line Magazine and Trucks.com. If you have a news tip or story idea, send her an email to chawes@freightwaves.com or @cage_writer on X, formerly Twitter.